On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:15:40 +0300 Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> said:
> On 29/07/11 03:37, Bruno Dilly wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:38:50 +0200 > >> Hugo Camboulive <hugo.camboul...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Really you're worried about the approaching 20k lines of a header? > >>> Please have a look at the 37k lines of the default.edc... that baby is > >>> 1.1MB of raw text, and contains every possible elementary widget. > >>> (there's a little difference with the header though : this one is made of > >>> very few comments) :-D > >> yeah, but nobody is arguing that default.edc is terrible. we all agree on > >> that point. > > > > it could be a edc file for each widget, and default would be just a > > bunch of includes. > > I (and probably many others) suggested it many times before, raster is > against, I don't remember why. edje_decc then breaks if we start using includes. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
