On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:17:14 +0900 Mike McCormack <mj.mccorm...@samsung.com> said:
it's 9pm on a friday night... and i don't think i'm going to get stuck into this right now. for now.. no one revert or do anything... i'll get to this tomorrow after some good sleep. :) > Hi All, > > This patch adds some level of thread safety to ecore. > It does not add thread awareness (i.e. adding a timer from a thread will not > wake a sleeping main loop). > > In my experience, developers either are ignorant of the problems of threads, > or expect libraries to magically work with threads. > > I understand that some people think that thread safety is not necessary, but > IMO, the performance cost and complexity is easily outweighed by the benefit > of meeting developer expectation. > > thanks, > > Mike -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
