On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) item_position_get() <-- returns position # of item > this could probably be implemented by updating the position index as > items are added/removed, though that would be a slowdown in large lists. > perhaps giving indexes to the item blocks and keeping position relative to > those would be better?
The problem is that block don't always have the same amount of items. So you need to update all blocks item start after an insertion. Depending on the size of a block and the size of the list, it could count. But that sounds like the only way to sanely implement it. > 2) reorder_delay_set() <-- manually change REORDER_EFFECT_TIME > having to wait 0.5s on a desktop makes apps feel sluggish, so being able to > reduce this would be great. I don't see any problem with that. Maybe we could get it from the theme ? -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
