On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:05:11 +0100 Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1) item_position_get() <-- returns position # of item > > this could probably be implemented by updating the position index as > > items are added/removed, though that would be a slowdown in large lists. > > perhaps giving indexes to the item blocks and keeping position relative to > > those would be better? > > The problem is that block don't always have the same amount of items. > So you need to update all blocks item start after an insertion. > Depending on the size of a block and the size of the list, it could > count. But that sounds like the only way to sanely implement it. yeah I was just trying to think of a way that wouldn't be totally O(N) > > > 2) reorder_delay_set() <-- manually change REORDER_EFFECT_TIME > > having to wait 0.5s on a desktop makes apps feel sluggish, so being able to > > reduce this would be great. > > I don't see any problem with that. Maybe we could get it from the theme ? hm that would be another option that I hadn't thought of. alternatively what about profiles? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
