On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:26:42 +0100 Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> 
>>>> said:
>>>>> Hey
>>>>>
>>>>> i'm against the merge of exotic just one week before the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently, there are a lot of copy/paste errorrs in the autotools, as
>>>>> well as some stuff that could be done a lot better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cedric : let exotic in svn, but please revert all your changes in the 
>>>>> other
>>>>> EFL.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i'm with you there - postpone until after release.
>>>
>>> I obviously disagree for three reasons :
>>
>> ii relevant because
>
> Expected from you :-) I know that you have a so strong mind and will,
> that you will not accept anything easily.
>
>>> - It doesn't impact non user of Exotic, so it's irrelevant for most people.
>>
>> the are errors in the autotools. Just before the release... I won't
>> have tiime to fix them as i'll be away during more than a week
>
> Please point them, that would help get them fixed. Or just wait a few
> hour that Gustavo wakeup and say that with CMake, it would have been
> eathier ;-)

some variables like _LIBS and so on, some requirement variables (you
just broke static compilation...) etc...

>
>>> - EFL 1.2 is likely to be the latest version that you can port with
>>> thread support and pipe. This will likely raise the complexity of
>>> porting it. So my understanding is that 1.2 is the latest easily
>>> portable version of the EFL.
>>
>> And having exotic in 1.2.1 is possible.
>
> That's adding a new feature. Doesn't match like a bug fixes or
> maintenance. That would mean that 1.2 become a maintained fork of the
> EFL. I don't like that much this idea.
>
>>> - There is no new API in Exotic, it's just renamed system call. So we
>>> already know that the API should never change.
>>
>> not a good reason...
>
> I like that argument.
>
>>> For all this reason, I think Exotic inclusion in the EFL should be there.
>>
>> so, no strong reason at all.
>>
>> You're adding quickly something that has not been tested. That should
>> merge evil and escape, and actually, nothing was merged. Can be post
>> poned.
>
> You maybe missed it, but this library already support another OS,

i know it supports Coyote (or at least, it's a strong guess)

> that both escape and evil doesn't support.

of course they don't support it !

> It's proven and work.

where's the proof ? Currently, you have broken static linking...

Vincent

> It provide
> all the grunt work for people that want to port EFL to any strange OS.
> So people that want to make it run on "embedded" OS or custom OS can
> now do it very easily with EFL.
> --
> Cedric BAIL
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to