On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:41:45 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> said:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:38:01 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN" > <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > > > Log: > > eet changelog/news update/sync > > > > > > > > Author: raster > > Date: 2012-03-25 21:38:01 -0700 (Sun, 25 Mar 2012) > > New Revision: 69626 > > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/69626 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/eet/ChangeLog trunk/eet/NEWS > > > > Modified: trunk/eet/ChangeLog > > =================================================================== > > --- trunk/eet/ChangeLog 2012-03-26 04:33:56 UTC (rev 69625) > > +++ trunk/eet/ChangeLog 2012-03-26 04:38:01 UTC (rev 69626) > > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ > > > > 2008-09-25 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > > > - 1.5.0 release > > + 1.1.0 release > > Um, it went backwards in release number? Again? > > According to the changelog, there was a 1.5.0 release in 2008, followed > by 1.20 in 2009. > > Soooo, @since 1.1.0 is what I put on the docs for my new eet macro? > Should other @since's be updated to reflect this backwards step? > > /me updates to see if this has all been fixed yet. no. look in more details... eg "2008". previous release i mis-search-replaced the wrong value to mark 1.5.0 release. fixed. 2008 was 1.1.0 -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
