On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN >>> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: >>>> Log: >>>> Remove warnings about unused parameters in examples. >>>> >>>> Author: gastal >>>> Date: 2012-03-29 13:55:55 -0700 (Thu, 29 Mar 2012) >>>> New Revision: 69769 >>>> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/69769 >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> trunk/elementary/src/examples/Makefile.am >>>> >>>> Modified: trunk/elementary/src/examples/Makefile.am >>>> =================================================================== >>>> --- trunk/elementary/src/examples/Makefile.am 2012-03-29 20:51:52 UTC >>>> (rev 69768) >>>> +++ trunk/elementary/src/examples/Makefile.am 2012-03-29 20:55:55 UTC >>>> (rev 69769) >>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ >>>> files_DATA = >>>> >>>> AM_CPPFLAGS = \ >>>> +-Wno-unused-parameter \ >>> >>> I'll wait for Vincent take on this, but for sure it will break with >>> non-gcc... but do we support non-gcc? >>> >>> The correct solution is a bit of a PITA, you need to save flags in >>> configure.ac, test if compiler supports, then save the flag in a >>> special variable you ask for replacement >>> (@NO_UNUSED_PARAMETER_CFLAGS@) at Makefile.am... :-/ >> >> i've written a macro that checks if a compiler flag is supported, and >> ad it to CFLAGS. Loook in eina/m4/common > > btw after investigating this for kmod, I noticed this is the wrong > thing to do (see this reference: > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Flag-Variables-Ordering.html). > > I've created another macro that plays well with _user_ flags like > CFLAGS/LDFLAGS: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/kernel/kmod/kmod.git;a=blobdiff;f=m4/attributes.m4;h=c80ae62ede635d3b1fccc22fd69f30c9f7f04250;hp=20d05e4bde8869db5022da1b1bebe9480dd03dbb;hb=e48f37657dc03aee9aace60bf14ef9af489bf47c;hpb=3ef7208ecfa2fb3edc0d3f6344811e686907c94c > > It's already applied in kmod and systemd. > > Vincent, would you be interested that I port it to EFL? Any objections?
in that case, I don't think that the order is important. Right ? Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel