On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/04/12 05:10, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > Elm box default layout does not respect it. It is a legacy code copied > from > > e17. After we created Eva's box we changed elm to use it, but kept the > old > > layout for compat. You can change the layout if you want. > > That's what Sachiel said as well, but it does respect weight, just in a > weird manner. > > I.e set both to 0.1 and they'll be of equal size. Set the 0.2 one to 0.3 > and the ratio will change, just not to be a multiple of 2/3. > > If it's really the case, I think we should change the default elm box > behaviour to use a more sane layouting scheme, i.e one that does what we > expect. > > If not before elm 1.0 then when? > Agreed, here. If we don't get to use Evas' box layout code here before the release, we'll have this odd, limited box behavior on Elm released. > > -- > Tom. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Gustavo Lima Chaves Senior Developer ProFUSION embedded systems http://profusion.mobi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
