On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/04/12 05:10, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> >> Elm box default layout does not respect it. It is a legacy code copied >> from >> e17. After we created Eva's box we changed elm to use it, but kept the old >> layout for compat. You can change the layout if you want. > > > That's what Sachiel said as well, but it does respect weight, just in a > weird manner. > > I.e set both to 0.1 and they'll be of equal size. Set the 0.2 one to 0.3 and > the ratio will change, just not to be a multiple of 2/3. > > If it's really the case, I think we should change the default elm box > behaviour to use a more sane layouting scheme, i.e one that does what we > expect. > > If not before elm 1.0 then when?
it was proposed and rejected by raster as it breaks existing apps (?) and 3rd party code (?) using the current behavior. AFAIR it was not an issue with sole weighting, but also the justify/fill that one requires and the other did not. It is simple to change the default box, 1 line of code. But I'm not doing it :-) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [email protected] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
