On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: >>> @@ -498,6 +533,22 @@ >>> #ifdef HAVE_PTHREAD >>> // pthread_mutex_unlock(&fi->ft_mutex); >>> #endif >> >> are you sure that you don't have to use macro LK*** instead of >> directly pthread (i fear a big problem on windows...) > > drogs?! he used the macros in his code, that one is context, was already there
drugs, indeed. I didn't see the //, I focalized on the pthread_** code. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
