On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:53:55 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:43:23 -0300 > Raphael Kubo da Costa <rak...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> writes: > > > > > I personally think that eina_iterator_free like any free function > > > should just work fine with NULL. I was against at that time, but > > > others won. So we do have this incoherency where some of our free > > > function work with NULL and some don't. > > > > So what can we do to improve the situation here (if it does need to > > be improved)? Speaking more generically, what criteria are used to > > decide that a function should be decorated with EINA_ARG_NONNULL > > and/or have magic checks performed? > > > > I am hugely in favor of having all _free() and _del() functions take > NULL arguments without erroring. I agree with that to. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
