Le 28/09/2012 09:04, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
>> Can you please revert your changes ?
> why? its better than the code that was there (your patch). your patch did 
> this:
>
> 1. find out size of file
> 2. alloc memory for ENTIRE file
> 3. fill buffer with  random data or 0xff
> 4. write whole buffer in 1 write call
> 5. fsync the file
>
> this will be JUSt as slow and blocking as the code there now, except the code
> now doesn't need as much memory. if it was a 2gb file u'd need 2gb of ram or
> it'd fail. now it needs a fixed 64k.
>
> so why revert it? it's an improvement.
You fucking don't understand what i told.

I told that

I HAVE ALREADY MADE A PATCH WHICH DOES A BETTER JOB
THAN YOURS, AND THAT I'M JUST WAITING FOR VTORRI

Isn't that fucking clear ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to