On 11/21/2012 10:11 PM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> <ras...@rasterman.com>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:21:53 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >>> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: >>> >>>> This is bad. Either do 1.7.2 before next alpha, or at least 1.7.2-alpha1 >>>> >>>> We really want people to test with the exactly same software. That's the >>>> way to avoid problems like this one, it should never ever happened at >>> this >>>> point! >>>> >>>> Wasn't discomfitor running from stable EFL to avoid these issues? >>> he's runing from the 1.7 branch - which is what will be 1.7.2... but that >>> didnt have the fix until i added it today. the alpha shouldnt have passed >>> "make >>> distcheck". >>> >> >> running from the branch isn't enough. he must run from the last release >> tarball to be sure he has exactly the same as other users. If there need to >> be a fix in EFL before next alpha, he must firstly release new EFL snapshot >> or release, then get E17 on top of that. >> >> this is the only way to assure users will be able to compile. I'm being >> picky here because we're at alpha4 already, very close to end and these >> kind of things were not expected to happen. But you know, the default theme >> is far from complete and thus the development may introduce some >> breakages... then I recommend you, the theme maker, to also run the same >> setup. >> >> as for make distcheck, I have no idea... likely he did not run it? How is >> the alpha release procedure going on? Just make distcheck and it's gold? >> Asking more folks at #edevelop to give it a try to tarballs before doing >> the announcement? Testing with some pristine VM running standard distros >> (fedora and ubunut)? > I'm testing (post-release) the alphas on a pristine vm just to make > sure that the packages install ok and have no issues. Could help mike > with doing this pre-release as well. > > But I agree, having to ask users to patch by themselves edje (or run > from the svn branch) is not a really good idea. > > Best regards, > --lf > >
I am doing similar for openSUSE on a clean vm updating, deleting .e running first time, checking connman then having a quick play around, I am also running alphas on a old laptop >> >> >> >> -- >> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> http://profusion.mobi embedded systems >> -------------------------------------- >> MSN: barbi...@gmail.com >> Skype: gsbarbieri >> Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single >> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, >> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. >> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
