On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:54:14 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz
> <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> said:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler 
> > <ras...@rasterman.com<javascript:;>
> >wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:41 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz
> > > <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> said:
> > >
> > > > ah, how quickly bets are made against me the instant I leave the
> country.
> > > > my league of admirers is always so reliable!
> > > >
> > > > distcheck is always run before a release. always.
> > >
> > > then how did it pass when the edje_cc in the 1.7 branch literally did
> > > crash in
> > > this scenario - it wasnt random. it literally was ALWAYS a strcmp
> against
> > > NULL...
> > >
> > > > I said previously that I run the stable branch at work; I'm not at
> work.
> > >
> > > aaaah so you didn't distcheck this one against stable branch?
> > >
> >
> > I'm on vacation, bedridden most of the time with the German Plague and a
> > fever so high that the top of it can't be seen from the peak of Mt.
> > Everest. Despite this, I managed to drag myself to my computer to try and
> > do a release.
> >
> > I would appreciate greatly if people could stop being less negative and
> > critical, and instead focus more on being both productive and
> constructive.
>
> fair enough - i just never expected this should even get through if you are
> building/testing against 1.7 - since you are not right now that dos create
> some
> issues and changes expectations that you are testing against that. :)



How about you, Raster? Are you able to test with 1.7.x? You've mentioned
this edje_cc bug and the Evas leaks. Anything else that is know but pending
to be debugged in EFL (leaks, crashes) or we can do a 1.7.2?



>
> >
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > > <ras...@rasterman.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:06:54 +0100 Vincent Torri <
> > > vincent.to...@gmail.com>
> > > > > said:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > > > > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > > > > > <ras...@rasterman.com>wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:21:53 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > > > > >> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > This is bad. Either do 1.7.2 before next alpha, or at least
> > > > > 1.7.2-alpha1
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > We really want people to test with the exactly same
> software.
> > > > > That's the
> > > > > > >> > way to avoid problems like this one, it should never ever
> > > happened
> > > > > at
> > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > >> > point!
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Wasn't discomfitor running from stable EFL to avoid these
> > > issues?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> he's runing from the 1.7 branch - which is what will be
> 1.7.2...
> > > but
> > > > > that
> > > > > > >> didnt have the fix until i added it today. the alpha shouldnt
> have
> > > > > passed
> > > > > > >> "make
> > > > > > >> distcheck".
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > running from the branch isn't enough. he must run from the last
> > > release
> > > > > > > tarball to be sure he has exactly the same as other users. If
> there
> > > > > need to
> > > > > > > be a fix in EFL before next alpha, he must firstly release new
> EFL
> > > > > snapshot
> > > > > > > or release, then get E17 on top of that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > this is the only way to assure users will be able to compile.
> I'm
> > > being
> > > > > > > picky here because we're at alpha4 already, very close to end
> and
> > > these
> > > > > > > kind of things were not expected to happen. But you know, the
> > > default
> > > > > theme
> > > > > > > is far from complete and thus the development may introduce
> some
> > > > > > > breakages... then I recommend you, the theme maker, to also
> run the
> > > > > same
> > > > > > > setup.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > as for make distcheck, I have no idea... likely he did not run
> it?
> > > How
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > the alpha release procedure going on? Just make distcheck and
> it's
> > > > > gold?
> > > > > > > Asking more folks at #edevelop to give it a try to tarballs
> before
> > > > > doing
> > > > > > > the announcement?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree. Especially for other distro like the BSD
> > > > >
> > > > > i'll put money on the fact that no other distros or os's are
> checked..
> > > and
> > > > > given alpha4 came out.. make distcheck wasn't used as edje_cc wil
> have
> > > > > segv's
> > > > > failing it.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
> > > --------------
> > > > > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    raster@rasterma



-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--------------------------------------
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to