On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Simon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 11/24/2012 09:19 PM, >> > [email protected] wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Simon<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >On 11/24/2012 08:53 PM, >> >>> >[email protected] wrote: >> >>>> >>i think that there are too much ML : enlightenment-announce also >> >>>> >>exists and the announce of the alpha4 is there. Imho, remove >> >>>> >>enlightenment-release mailing list >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>Vincent >> >>> >I think it's good to have a separate mailing list where issues >> regarding >> >>> >releases or issues >> >> what's the difference of the "release" ML and the "announce" ML ? >> >> >> >> 1) they have exactly the same purpose >> >> 2) the "announce" one exists for longer time and has already the >> >> announce of previous releases >> >> >> >> so let kill the "release" ML >> >> >> >> Vincent >> >> >> > In other projects Announce just announces a new Release cycle i.e. EFL >> > 1.8.0 has been released or It's the end of the world and Enlightenment >> > e17 has been released today, where as released or packaging as a >> > alternate name would also announce changes to release procedures >> > available config options, moving to a split tree, etc etc as a rule of >> > thumb the things packagers want or should know without needing to read >> > the Devel mailing list. For me currently 99% of what i care about in >> > enlightenment is related to packaging and releasing this sort of stuff >> > and discussion around these issues make up less then 5% of discussion on >> > the devel list so ideally i and other packagers should be able to >> > subscribe to this list and not have to pay to much attention to the >> > devel list. Often these discussions are not just that a new version of >> > the libs has been released. >> >> the probability to send mail to the wrong ML is higher. In addition: >> >> 1) there are more people who have subscribed to the announce ML, so >> better information spread >> 2) I'm not sure that people want more and more subscriptions to MLs. >> In my case, i'm quite fed up with all the ML i have already >> subscribed, and i have unsubscribe from a lot of them. >> >> > The reason many people subscribe to the announce mailing list is because it > is by definition a low-volume mailing list, with no discussions allowed, > made for the sole purpose of *announcing* releases. > > The new ML is for the people who are working on preparing the releases, > packaging them and doing testing. Though we do have many mailing lists, it > seems to me like they have each their specific purpose.
e-devel ML is perfectly suited for what you propose. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
