On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:33:30 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
<snip> > eo to some very minor extent does kind of "invent a new lang" within > c. i mulled the idea of an added pre-processor at compile time to be > able to add things like namespacing and cutting down typing fluff but > others rejected the idea. it didn't happen - ok. fair enough. it'd be > c PLUS some efl speciic "language extensions" in a preprocessor much > "smarter" than cpp. c++ would entail a massive change much more > invasive than eo and it'd come with other side-effects too like the > complaints of build times and memory needed just to build efl from > eveyr dev. your complaints herew oudl jsut morph into other peoples > complaints about this. One other problem with a change to C++, I would leave, and I suspect many others would to. Though I'm sure there would be an influx of new C++ developers to compensate. It's not that I don't know C++, I've been doing C++ programming professionally for over a decade. I just much prefer C to C++. Very strongly prefer. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
