On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:50:30 +0900 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said:

> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:09:35 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
> > <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> said:
> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:58:49 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
> >> > <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> said:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> >> >> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Log:
> >> >> > work around edbus issues by forcing the mainloop to run at least one
> >> >> >   cycle with some dummy things... in ipc launch mode.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >   also make selection jump to end if a newline is there - as disussed
> >> >> > on ml.
> >> >>
> >> >> could you detail a little bit what is the issue. Looking at the code,
> >> >> I couldn't understand why you put all this ipc stuff, instead of doing
> >> >> something like eve does.
> >> >
> >> > leak here:
> >> >
> >> > ==23628== 120 (64 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
> >> > lost in loss record 70 of 107
> >> > ==23628==    at 0x4C29E84: calloc
> >> > (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==23628==    by
> >> > 0xB48344F: edbus_connection_name_get (edbus_core.c:476) ==23628==    by
> >> > 0xB482EA8: edbus_connection_name_object_set (edbus_core.c:413) ==23628==
> >> > by 0xB48DF6B: edbus_object_get (edbus_object.c:211) ==23628==    by
> >> > 0xB484E7A: _connection_get (edbus_core.c:941) ==23628==    by 0xB484FC1:
> >> > edbus_connection_get (edbus_core.c:968) ==23628==    by 0x8233529:
> >> > efreet_cache_init (efreet_cache.c:129) ==23628==    by 0x822433D:
> >> > efreet_init (efreet.c:78) ==23628==    by 0x4F28E2F: elm_need_efreet
> >> > (elm_main.c:449) ==23628==    by 0x408CCA: config_init (config.c:24)
> >> > ==23628==    by 0x40DA1B: elm_main (main.c:1003)
> >> > ==23628==    by 0x40E7FB: main (main.c:1322)
> >> > ==23628==
> >>
> >> we fixed this one... could you confirm it's ok now?
> >
> > yup. this one is gone... now you can look at the wonderful evas async
> > leak... i have a terminology using 6gb... :) pretty impressive if you ask
> > me! :)
> 
> Interestingly enough I don't see that bug in Terminology, but my
> Enlightenment is leaking fast and over one night it does have a crazy
> 1.5GB memory usage. I believe the issue are related.

i enabled multi-instance and just ran rebuilds of efl on 6 different
machines... a lot of scrolling... similar test to what valgrind log i showed
with 700m usage.


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to