On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:29:37 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> said:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:43:44 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:51:16 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: > > > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > > <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:50:08 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > > > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: > > > > > > > >> On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, David Seikel wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:48:14 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" > > > >> > <no-re...@enlightenment.org <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Log: > > > >> > > add missing licenses references, fix copyright, add link > > > >> > > result notice. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Author: barbieri > > > >> > > Date: 2013-01-16 13:48:14 -0800 (Wed, 16 Jan 2013) > > > >> > > New Revision: 82911 > > > >> > > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/82911 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Modified: > > > >> > > trunk/efl/COPYING trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Modified: trunk/efl/COPYING > > > >> > > =================================================================== > > > >> > > --- trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:47:37 UTC (rev 82910) > > > >> > > +++ trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:48:14 UTC (rev 82911) > > > >> > > @@ -1,11 +1,23 @@ > > > >> > > -EFL comes with several licences. Listed are the > > > >> > > library/probject +EFL comes with several licences. Listed > > > >> > > are the library/project name and the license file covering > > > >> > > it. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > evil: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > -escape: licenses/COPYING.GPL > > > >> > > +escape: licenses/COPYING.GPL (used in PlayStation > > > >> > > native) +eina: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > >> > > eet: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > -eina: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > >> > > eo: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > evas: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > +embryo: licenses/COPYING.SMALL > > > >> > > ecore: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > -embryo: licenses/COPYING.SMALL > > > >> > > +eio: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > >> > > +edbus: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > >> > > +efreet: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > +eeze: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > +ephysics: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > +edje: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > +edje/epp: licenses/COPYING.GPL (separate > > > >> > > binary/executable) +emotion: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > >> > > +ethumb: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > >> > > + > > > >> > > +NOTE: If linked together, the result will be LGPL (or GPL > > > >> > > is Escape is +used) due that license characteristics. > > > >> > > > > >> > Hmmm, guess that means the BSD licences are useless, since > > > >> > it's all gonna be linked together anyway, and thus GPL > > > >> > contaminated. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> That is right. For all purposes consider EFL = LGPL. We just > > > >> didn't change the license as it would require approvals. But > > > >> effectively it's all LGPL. > > > > > > > > incorrect. only if we make a single libefl.so is this the case. > > > > > > The on-disk .so files are not, but as soon as they are dynamically > > > linked in the application they do that. Unfortunately I had to learn > > > that with some lawyers :-P > > > > they don't make your application lgpl. that dont make it gpl. they > > dont make it bsd. they dont affect your application at all... unless > > you STATICALLY link... lgpl is very explicit about its boundaries. > > GPL - yes. LGPL - no. > > No, I'm not spreading FUD. I commented if the LGPL had spread to cover > the BSD licensed parts. Gustavo agreed it did, then said later that a it has not. that is utterly false saying it does. > lawyer taught him that it does, and he even said in his original commit > that it did. You can call it what you want, I'd call it "viral", and > it's not FUD to call it that. Gustavo seems to think it spread it's > influence, the lawyer he mentions seems to think so to, but Gustavo > thinks using the word "virus" is FUD. I call a spade a spade, it > spread like a virus. It's a legal problem, lawyers might know what > they are talking about. We programmers can argue all we like, the only > definitive answer is for a judge to make in a court of law. different binaries are licensed differently and the license applies to what is distributed - eg binaries. what applies to source is irrelevant here mostly due to the fact that all src is shipped anyway - be it bsd or lgpl. its the binaries that count. evas has not become lgpl. if you like to evas then what you link to it has not become bsd or lgpl. > Let's all just agree to disagree, until a court informs us otherwise. > > -- > A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants > coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
