On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:08:44 +0900 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Iván Briano <sachi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > >> Of course we don't start a feature addition cycle if current master > >> branch is unstable. The hope is to be on a more rapid development > >> cycle, but still stable and avoiding glacial era like we have before > >> each release. Finally it should give us a good release every 3 months. > >> It should not change our workflow to much and still be an improvement > >> over our current model. > >> > >> Any though or improvement about it ? Or a better proposal ? > > > > The question was whether we'll all have write permission to the master > > branch and push stuff there as we do with SVN or if we'll keep our own > > repositories and have someone(s) integrate them into upstream. > > My answer is maybe not clear enough, but nobody will be a gate keeper > in that proposal. We will rely on developer good will. yes - no gatekeepers. you either have push access (equivalent to svn commit access), play nice and behave (or be kicked out of having access), or you do not (and then you submit patches). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
