On 13/02/13 10:42, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann <d.willm...@samsung.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Topic branches:
>>> * In each repository every developer with commit access will be able to
>>>    push/update branches in their own namespace (devs/<name>/*). These
>>>    branches will allow non-fastforward updates and no one should expect
>>>    these to be stable.
>>> * This is a testing ground for developers where new features can be
>>>    developed, debugged and shared with fellow developers. Ideally any new
>>>    feature would live in its own branch until it matures and is merged
>>>    into master.
>>
>> Hey Daniel,
>>
>> It's a nice proposal, but what about master branch permissions ?
>> Every developer would be allowed to push stuff on there (with a flow
>> similar to svn) ? Or we'll try to establish some kind of policy about
>> it (maintainers, review, etc) ?
>
> As others have already pointed out there seems to be consensus that we
> don't have enough manpower to work with an integrator workflow (whether
> or not that's true I don't know).
>
> What I want to achieve with the topic branches is that whoever wants to
> can maintain an integrator-like workflow. You develop your feature in a
> topic branch, then post a request for review/review and test yourself
> and if everything looks good you can merge into master.
>
> Speaking of merging...is there any preference on merge vs. rebase?


Rebase is easier to work with. I think we should rebase whenever 
possible. When not possible, we should try to rebase anyway. Linear 
history is cooler.

--
Tom.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to