I've written up a nice wiki page on this after some experimentation: https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/arcanist/
Please use arc(anist) to submit patches, or we get no context. right now I KNOW if you have commit access you can submit a patch and commit it. You can even push it before approval, but arc complains. I currently don't know what to do about patches submitted if you do not have commit access. I don't know if arc land will work or not - but I suspect it won't. The problem is, if a reviewer tries to land a patch from someone else themselves, then arc seems to be most unhappy complaining about revisions. We need to work out the kinks in this process, But I think this can/will streamline patch submission and review a lot for us. The phab web ui is not bad at all for review. it's pretty much what gerrit is, just a bit prettier. So sorry to the first few people being guinea pigs, but once this settles, things will be better. :) I've at least documented what I know so far as above. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
