On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Willmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 00:56:24 +0900 > Daniel Juyung Seo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok so, I consider we use "rebase" not "merge". >> Thanks. > > Yeah, the consensus seemed to be rebase not merge.
Yes that's what I guessed. > In any case I enabled commit graphs so you can actually see the correct > history with merges in the log: That's great :) Btw, I use "qgit" as my local git tools. I prefer "qgit" to "gitk". But I want to have "eGit" written by EFL. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/log/ > > > Regards, > Daniel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
