On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:59:46 +0100, Daniel Willmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > On 26/03/13 10:41, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 26/03/13 10:32, Kim Woelders wrote: > >>> However, I have been adding (simple) tags for a number of release >>> commits, but it looks like I'm not allowed to push them: >>> $ git push --tags >>> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) >>> remote: C refs/tags/e16-1.0.10 e16/e16 kwo DENIED by fallthru >>> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/tags/e16-1.0.10 >>> remote: C refs/tags/e16-1.0.11 e16/e16 kwo DENIED by fallthru >>> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/tags/e16-1.0.11 >>> remote: C refs/tags/e16-1.0.12 e16/e16 kwo DENIED by fallthru >>> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/tags/e16-1.0.12 >>> To git+ssh://[email protected]/e16/e16.git >>> ! [remote rejected] e16-1.0.10 -> e16-1.0.10 (hook declined) >>> ! [remote rejected] e16-1.0.11 -> e16-1.0.11 (hook declined) >>> ! [remote rejected] e16-1.0.12 -> e16-1.0.12 (hook declined) >>> error: failed to push some refs to >>> 'git+ssh://[email protected]/e16/e16.git' >>> >>> Is this on purpose? > >> Yes, the format for tags is: >> v1.0.10 > > We decided on this to make all the repositories look alike and not have > a chaos with some repos using one format and others using something > completely different. > > Having said that I fear that we are sort of screwing with a workflow > that you have been used to and using for a while now, which is > definitely not what we intended! > > The question now is: How do we go forward? > > Would it be okay/easy for you to change the work flow? > Do you have convincing arguments why our current work flow is flawed and > we should change? > Do you want us to leave your repositories the hell alone so you can do > with it whatever you want? > > I would be strongly in favour of option 1, but then...I'm biased. > Now having been educated about annotated vs light-weight tags I'm fine with using annotated tags, and I'm fine with the general version numbering scheme too :) Thanks, /Kim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
