On 26/03/13 15:58, Kim Woelders wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:59:46 +0100, Daniel Willmann > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 26/03/13 10:41, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> On 26/03/13 10:32, Kim Woelders wrote: >> >>>> However, I have been adding (simple) tags for a number of release >>>> commits, but it looks like I'm not allowed to push them: >>>> $ git push --tags >>>> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) >>>> remote: C refs/tags/e16-1.0.10 e16/e16 kwo DENIED by fallthru >>>> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/tags/e16-1.0.10 >>>> remote: C refs/tags/e16-1.0.11 e16/e16 kwo DENIED by fallthru >>>> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/tags/e16-1.0.11 >>>> remote: C refs/tags/e16-1.0.12 e16/e16 kwo DENIED by fallthru >>>> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/tags/e16-1.0.12 >>>> To git+ssh://[email protected]/e16/e16.git >>>> ! [remote rejected] e16-1.0.10 -> e16-1.0.10 (hook declined) >>>> ! [remote rejected] e16-1.0.11 -> e16-1.0.11 (hook declined) >>>> ! [remote rejected] e16-1.0.12 -> e16-1.0.12 (hook declined) >>>> error: failed to push some refs to >>>> 'git+ssh://[email protected]/e16/e16.git' >>>> >>>> Is this on purpose? >> >>> Yes, the format for tags is: >>> v1.0.10 >> >> We decided on this to make all the repositories look alike and not have >> a chaos with some repos using one format and others using something >> completely different. >> >> Having said that I fear that we are sort of screwing with a workflow >> that you have been used to and using for a while now, which is >> definitely not what we intended! >> >> The question now is: How do we go forward? >> >> Would it be okay/easy for you to change the work flow? >> Do you have convincing arguments why our current work flow is flawed and >> we should change? >> Do you want us to leave your repositories the hell alone so you can do >> with it whatever you want? >> >> I would be strongly in favour of option 1, but then...I'm biased. >> > > Now having been educated about annotated vs light-weight tags I'm fine > with using annotated tags, and I'm fine with the general version numbering > scheme too :)
We all saw your commits, nice one. :) Btw, I've also been recently educated about those, quite annoying annotated are not the default. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
