Simon <[email protected]> writes: > Simple fix for the main, that i modified from a version someone at > SUSE did for something similar, basicly they added another param to > some functions to return a error code. Our functions already had a > error code but i thought it would be bad form to change the existing > function behavior by returning a bunch of new errors that could > conflict with existing code. I just added the error param and > discarded the results, there's almost certainly a better way but this > should be a good start for someone.
I'd rather just pass NULL as the last parameter to DGifOpen: the code is explicitly designed not to fail or crash if it's NULL and we're not using `err' for anything. -- Intel Finland Oy Open Source Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
