On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:04:32 +0100 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> said:
> Hey, > > I often argue against adding new features (and bugs), libs, widgets, > etcetera. > > I often explain my stance in a per case way. However I stumbled across > this nice article which explains where I am coming from. > > You should probably read it, and hopefully be more conscious about it: > http://firstround.com/article/The-one-cost-engineers-and-product-managers-dont-consider there's a project you'd love and adore. it's called gnome 3. remove all possibly removable features and options. :) yes. features. code.. they cost more than just development. it's called maintenance. s a project gets bigger (more code. more features) it requires more manpower for maintenance. that's life. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
