On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:26:10 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <[email protected]>
said:

> Hello.
> 
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 18:22, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:11:08 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > <[email protected]> said:
> > 
> > > Hello.
> > > 
> > > As of today the second merge window for the 1.9 cycle is open. (I know
> > > merge window is not 100% accurate here as we mostly commit directly
> > > and not really merge but it make it so much easier to understand).
> > > 
> > > Raster and others already started to commit bigger changes. Feel free
> > > to do the same.
> > > 
> > > One word on the next stabilization phase coming after this merge
> > > window (starting 11.02). On some commits during the first
> > > stabilization period I was a bit lax. It was the first time we are
> > > doing a release cycle like this and I realize people need to adapt to
> > > changes. I also had in mind that another merge window with big code
> > > changes will follow anyway.
> > > 
> > > This laxness will be tuned down on the second, and last, stabilization
> > > period. Think twice before you commit something during that time when
> > > it does not clearly fix a bug (best with phab ticket number). This
> > > last stabilization period will heavily influence how people will
> > > perceive or change to doing rapid releases. It can go from "to early,
> > > to buggy" to "Good job". I for one would like to see the later.
> > > 
> > > Besides these words of warning I'm pleased so far with handling the
> > > release. People played by the changed rules and focused on what was
> > > expected during the different periods. Thanks!
> > 
> > can i recomment for the next stabilization period we work out some way of
> > making lots of noise about:
> > 
> > 1. coverity scan issues to be fixed
> > 2. clang analysis issues to fix
> > 3. MOST IMPORTANT - ... bugs that have already been filed in phab. it'd be
> > really good to have some kind of report and make a tonne of noise about
> > bugs we have open. during stability no wishlist bugs - the actual bug
> > bugs... :)
> 
> All three are listed in my weekly QA mail but I figure you would like
> something more prominent. I should try mention these when sending the
> mails for the stabilization period to start. Any other suggestions?

i'm talking about more prominent and noisy... somehow... dial it up to 11. :)


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to