On Tue, 20 May 2014 18:46:24 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:11:59 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> > said: > > > On Tue, 20 May 2014 15:50:54 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 23:40:13 +0100 Andrew Williams > > > <a...@andywilliams.me> said: > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > After opening this task about indow sizes in elm not respecting > > > > the scale set: > > > > https://phab.enlightenment.org/T1263 > > > > I realised that these are all set through evas_object_resize > > > > which clearly cannot know about elm scaling. > > > > > > > > Would there be any objection to creating an elm_win_resize or > > > > elm_win_size_set method that were to apply the scaling to the > > > > values beffore passing back to evas resize? > > > > > > > > Let me know equally if I've missed something but the elm_test > > > > code is all this way too. > > > > > > not so simple. as daniel mentioned.. this is doable with a resize > > > multipling by scale... what we are currently missign in elm is 2 > > > things. > > > > > > 1. a nice simple way to add extra minimum sizing to a widget. > > > currently the ADVICE it so make a table, put an invisible rect in > > > the 0,0 1x1 cell ANd your real widget in the same cell. set a min > > > size hint on the rect and presto - it acts as an extra "control" > > > on the table and thus your widget (set widget to fill/expand). > > > you can set the min size and multiple by scaling if you want. > > > it'd be likely useful if this trick were formalised into a widget > > > and/or some utility func. a simple elc_ thing to wrap this up > > > would work - then if it scales the min size by scale factor or > > > also put in finger size. > > > > > > and > > > > > > 2. more your focus - though #1 often is related. you want a > > > *PREFERRED* size for an object - an initial size that is possibly > > > bigger than min size and less than max - somewhere in between. > > > believe it or not we have a "request" size which is kind of > > > intended for exactly this. what we DON'T have is logic in elm > > > that... > > > > > > * watches for changes in preferred size and if > 0x0, just like > > > min size, propagates preferred size to a parent widget. > > > * that takes preferred size once it propagates to the window > > > and on first show actually resizes to that size > > > * code that might set preferred size AND account for scaling > > > > > > reality is that you have a window where some widget (or widgets) > > > - eg the text entry, is what you want to have at a preferred size > > > on start... not the window as a whole, so you really want this > > > propagation. it requires the same calcs as min - but providing > > > preferred size as if it were min, then passing onto parent > > > etc. ... this is what we really want. problem is - we haven't > > > done it yet. this is the solution we want... not elm_win_reisze > > > (that uses scaling) which is just as much a "workaround" as > > > evas_object_resize on the window itself :) > > > > Yes, I agree with that, Elm handling of minimum sizes seems to be > > almost entirely lacking or broken. In particular I've stumbled on > > entrys and naviframes seem to set their minimum width to what ever > > you set the original width to, but their minimum height to zero. > > i dont know abut naviframe, but entries - depends on content. > scrollable entries (the common case) - never. Nope. Unless the problem is that box doesn't bother to get the minimum size from child objects. I have two scrollable entries in a box, plus a button. When I resize the window they are in down to minimum size, the height of the entries goes all the way down to zero, the button doesn't change height. > the problem is the > wrapping where min height depends on width. its a sticky case to > solve. none of the above changes this though... unless you meant the > first where you can now add an additional min size on something (in > addition to its native min size) Well, for scrollable entries, I would guess that being big enough to see all the parts of the scroll bar so you can use it should be minimum. B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
