Hello, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Chris Michael <devilho...@comcast.net> wrote: > On 07/02/2014 01:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> We already had an argument about it on the ML a few months back. >> >> ((a == b) && !c) >> >> Is the correct way of doing it. You don't need to surround single (or >> single negated) expressions with parenthesis. All of us hate it and find >> it terribly annoying. It doesn't appear anywhere in the EFL except for >> some pieces of code you managed to sneak in. :) >> > > Well actually, it used to be done like that way back in the day (even > before you were around so it's not about me "sneaking stuff in" and I'd > appreciate it very much if you did not start making this personal).
You may have noticed that I stop answering thread with this kind of behavior. Maybe it is time for us to have a code of conduct to limit this kind of behavior as many of us dislike it, their is no improvement in that regard and it seems it needs to be formalized to have some kind of effect... -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
