On 16/04/15 01:13, ChunEon Park wrote: > I agree reverting if the api is not proper. > > but, > > why don't you feel comfortable?
The API is bad, was snuck in during the freeze (bad) without talking to anyone (not just me) with any Eo development experience/involvement (bad). We didn't even get to the lack of tests required for every new API in the EFL since recently and every new API in Eo since the beginning. > and what is your suggestion? I don't remember if I talked about it on IRC, but I have talked about it on the respective ticket on phab. > > eo is not your toy project. What the fuck are you talking about? > > anyhow it seems the patch came from the eo problem. Could be, let's discuss it then, not sneak in half-assed solutions without talking to anyone. > > if you think you are the maintainer of the eo then get more responsibility. When have I not taken responsibility over Eo? tl;dr: wtf are you talking about? -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
