On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:39:16 +0100 Tom Hacohen <t...@osg.samsung.com> said:
> On 01/06/15 14:33, Andrew Williams wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > In EDI I have packaged a clone of the skeleton project (so you don't have > > to be online to use the feature) and made a few small improvements. Today > > it was pointed out to me that it is GPLv2/3 licensed which is not very > > helpful to people wanting to use it. > > > > https://git.enlightenment.org/tools/skeleton.git > > > > My intent is to move this to BSD - does anyone have objections to this > > plan? Specifically I need a response from Cedric, Jérémy and Tom who have > > contributed to this project over the last 18 months. > > > > I have already changed elm_code to LGPL expecting it's inclusion into EFL > > or Elementary and I will look at the license of EDI itself later. > > I'm in favour of moving it to BSD. As I said on IRC, it's crazy it was > created as GPL in the first place. i might even argue that skeletons should be "public domain" maybe? basically provide zero worries on license of an app you start making with edi - license choice is yours totally. that'd be the "right way" at least for core/common templates. perhaps very large/complex ones might come with more involved licenses... but the basic stuff... public domain. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
