Hello. On 26/11/15 17:39, Tom Hacohen wrote: > As you said in the commit message, and just to correct terminology: > > You are not "forcing empty function parameters", it's just how the > syntax works. > > int foo(); // Unspecified parameters > int foo(void); // No parameters > > So probably it should be better described as "correct declaration of > function with no parameters". > > I'm being a bit pedantic, but it's just that obviously someone (whoever > wrote that code) doesn't know the difference, so it's important to make > it crystal clear for current and future contributors.
Point taken. The batch for elm will use the changed subject line. regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK. Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment. Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741551&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
