On 14/01/16 01:39, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:07:01 +0000 Andrew Williams <[email protected]> > said: > >> Hi, >> >> I agree with all your points and consider the merge a good thing. However >> I'm not sure why we're avoiding a --disable flag for those who specifically >> don't want it - is it much work to satisfy a use case? > > it ENCOURAGES people then to make efl builds without widgets (elm). this is > not > something we'd want to encourage. >
I disagree. It doesn't encourage that, it just doesn't discourage it as much. Package maintainers will build with the widgets, and people who know what they are doing and know they need the fat off will use it. Heck, if you really want, call it --disable-elementary-i-really-know-what-i-am-doing-i-dont-like-widgets. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
