On Jun 26, 2016 6:51 AM, "Davide Andreoli" <d...@gurumeditation.it> wrote: >
[snip] > Yeah, I totally agree on the SECOND point! > With promise syntax seems you are trying to force other laguages (C, > python, etc) > to match a syntax that is JS only, making all the other uglyer. > In python for example there are no promise concept at all, forcing python > developer to use a .then method don't make ANY SENSE in a pythonic syntax. I'm probably missing something, because I don't see how am I requiring a specific syntax when I've been advocating for manual binding based on a well-defined asynchronous semantics (through promises) where even coroutines can be built upon it. Where even a promise_then call is _NOT_ legal, much less required. [snip] Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
