On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:54 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote: > On Sun, 14 May 2017 06:58:01 +0200 > Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Try to fix it. Add elm functions which are needed, at least for X and >> if you can, for Wayland. > > That is funny! Spend my time fixing an issue other have ignored for > years. Despite that I cannot run Wayland. Those that do are not seeking > to further EFL in needed ways such as addressing the above. Yet they > make it the responsibility of people looking to develop applications to > do such. That seems a bit off and funny! > > It is not my fault code exists in ecore x, that may not in wayland, > win32, etc. That the abstracted layer elm_cnp, does not support the > coded stuff in ecore x, much less adding the same to others. This seems > like quite a bit of work and not trivial in nature. Which is likely why > it was never done. > > Bit ironic to give someone grief then expect them to do work in an area > others have not. That is not a good way to motivate someone....
If i have had this kind of reasoning, i would never have written the Windows port, nor beginning Mac OS X port, the BSD* and Solaris ports. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
