On Tue, 16 May 2017 02:45:26 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
>
> I addressed a bug report on IRC. I can do whatever I like in our
> repos. I build ecrire from our git. After the report I tried it on
> Wayland. It crashed I fixed it. I pushed the fix. Telling me I cannot
> do that is not your place.

Um NO!
I addressed the proper bug report that preceeded that in IRC by days...
https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/ecrire/issues/2

I even mentioned it on the README for the project.
https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/ecrire/commit/4db8162c615db6a2faeeb07629f155bd49a3805c#diff-04c6e90faac2675aa89e2176d2eec7d8L17

I was already working on a proper fix. Which I had addressed it in a
temporary way already. In the repository that is being actively
developed and used. The person reporting such on IRC was likely using
MY repo not your old dead one you commit to.

It VERY much is my place given I am the one who is furthering ecrire
NOT you. I am the one responsible. If YOU want to take over all bug
reports, maintenance, and furthering the ecrire project then go ahead.
You had MANY years you could do such.

Stay out of my way if you are not going to be helpful. All you have
done now, is created a fork. You can keep your old dead repo to
yourself. I will continue on as I have outside.

Problem solved and done!

> You have got to be kidding. You can't read. You started to accuse me
> of micromanagement. It has nothing to do with bug tickets. Just
> because one exists doesn't magically make it my responsibility to go
> address it. But that's irrelevant to this.

That is exactly what you were doing. Yet you will not do such when it
is needed like doing releases for packages that were broken with a new
EFL release.

Not to mention YOU said to wait for permission from Tom. Which I got
for taking over HIS project NOT YOURS!!!! 

Given the FACT you have NEVER commit to that repo ever before.
https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/ecrire/graphs/contributors

You have NO ground to stand on what so ever. You have NO legal
ownership. You have no rights as an author. The license is regular GPL
nothing Enlightenment specific etc. Thus  you have NO ownership or any
involvement. Back off!!!

Ecrire is NOT your project. It never has been. Now it definitely will
not be. Nor will I look to ever want to gain access to git.e.org repos.
Not with a crazy tyrant running around.

> Actually I had no idea what you were or were not doing. I hadn't
> looked. But sure... assume away.

You have a terrible memory. We discussed this on IRC a  few times. I
can show you logs. It would be shocking that most everyone in the
community knows Ecrire is being developed again. They likely know I am
doing that. I have been making noise on such on this list going back
several days. Long before that IRC session you speak of.

How you could miss it, despite our direct conversations. You asking me
to get permission from Tom, thus filing this ticket per your request.
That is simply amazing!!
https://phab.enlightenment.org/T5411

> Oh you did. WTF do you think "Rather than any of that, sadly Raster
> went and commented out the code." is meant to mean? It's "how dare
> you do anything to this code in your repo! Stop doing it". That's
> precisely what it's saying.

No what it said was. I care less someone is working on Ecrire. I know
better. I will go in and touch a repo I have never before. Making a
commit, despite it not having any in years.  It was wrong on so many
levels.

But I come back to it was the worst thing to do technically. Removing
function. When YOU should know how to properly code such in your sleep
with your eyes closed....

Rather interesting how simple the fix was. Yet no one was able to
provide any clear examples or help. Like with the simple question, what
object do I pass to  elm_cnp_selection_get. No one answered that
question. Thus aside from some rubber ducking. I came up with the
solution without any code samples etc from anyone.

I likely know less about EFL than all others....

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.

Attachment: pgpg9DlKCynDV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to