https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Code-of-conduct
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> wrote: > Hi Team, Friends and Community, > > Can we please take a breath, think about how we would like to be thought of > and consider this when we fire out emails to this list. We are a community, > a diverse community at that, and I love it - there is something for > everyone independent of interest, background or experience level. > > Looking at this email thread I am worried. Not for any particular message > but because of the general inclination to forget that, as a community, we > are all looking to progress the libraries, APIs and applications that > encapsulate our understanding of what a great environment can be. Can we > all please step back for a moment and see the good intention or reasoning > behind the communications rather than what seems to be the reverse. > > Words like ownership, blame, fault and rights do not befit a community that > has developed for so long as ours to embrace contribution from so many > angles. I for one want to feel that we are, without exception, > communicating in a way that we think is an example of how we would like > others to consider approaching ourselves. Exclusive rights do not exist - > everything we do is collaborative and at times we must resolve conflicts > and merge multiple streams of development - that is life and it's a great > thing to progress and deliver meaningful products for a wide community. > > I understand that many of these messages come from personal passion or from > deep understanding of what we want to do - but as these are largely > internal factors we must strive to understand both to progress forward. Can > we please do more to understand each other as we discuss where > understanding may be lacking or assumptions are not accurate? > > Imaginging for a moment if I were a completely new comer to this community > and I saw such a discussion I would certainly be disheartened and may fail > to get far enough to see the fantastic tech and possibilities that EFL > should be bringing to the world. > > Thanks for taking the time to read, I appreciate it and hope that some > reflection could help us to better build on the work of those both internal > and external to the core project. > > Looking forward to Malta - a beer is always great for grounding > conversation :) > Andy > > On Mon, 15 May 2017 at 20:14 William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt...@o-sinc.com> > wrote: > >> At this point in time. I have no interest of gaining access to >> git.e.org repositories. I will continue any and all EFL application >> development outside. >> >> I will consider my work going forward on ecrire to be a fork. I may >> rename it and other things. I really haven't the time for the >> mistreatment or the back and forth. >> >> If this is how new contributors are treated. It really explains why so >> few things are in EFL. I am questioning how crazy I am to stay and not >> run from this community. Though I will not hold all responsible for the >> actions of the main person. I do not need to subject myself to such. >> >> Sadly I can see that leadership has already trickled down into some. It >> is really bad all around. That people who work for Samsung conduct >> themselves that way in public.... >> >> On Mon, 15 May 2017 12:44:34 -0400 >> "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:30 +0000 >> > Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi William, >> > > >> > > I'm glad that is now resolved, thanks for figuring it out. >> > >> > Sure, I was already working on it when all the discussion came up. >> > Which is why I commented on others committing. Does not make sense for >> > more than one to work on same problem without discussion or >> > coordination. >> > >> > > Back to the main topic of the thread - is your intention to get this >> > > merged back up to master on git.e.org? I think that will affect the >> > > coding style etc expectations and so forth, so I was interested in >> > > the overall plan :) >> > >> > Merging back into the old repo on git.e.org was the intention. I >> > believe I am following most if not all coding styles etc. Though maybe >> > some places that could use some correction. The code is at least as >> > good as what is in that old repo. >> > >> > How things proceed is up to others. I am continuing on with my >> > development effort. It is pretty moot to me. For now could look to >> > pull my changes into that repo and do that automated daily, etc. >> > >> > Beyond that not sure. Still concerned with working in public repos if >> > people will just commit without any coordination or discussion with >> > others. Otherwise I have no issue with my effort being pulled back >> > into main repo. As for any direct commit access, that is rather moot >> > for me. >> > >> > That is more if you all want the development to be official or third >> > party effort to develop ecrire. It is up to you all to decide. My >> > only thoughts are, if my work is being merged back into ecrire >> > git.e.org repo and I do not have direct commit access. I would not >> > want others working in that repo. I will not be pulling just pushing >> > to git.e.org for any syncing. Just something to keep in mind. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> William L. Thomson Jr. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> > -- > http://andywilliams.me > http://ajwillia.ms > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
