On Sunday, Feb 15, 2004 at 21:01, Kim Woelders wrote:
> This is a known issue.
> I think the change is in this commit:
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/enlightenment/e16/e/src/arrange.c?r1=1.53&r2=1.54

Thanks for the pointer... By removing an "if" statement i got the old
behaviour back. Here's the diff against version 1.63 of arrange.c,
freshly pulled from CVS:

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


--- arrange.c.cvs       Sun Feb  8 11:17:58 2004
+++ arrange.c   Sun Feb 15 21:41:45 2004
@@ -497,9 +497,6 @@
                       spaces[num_spaces].y = yarray[y];
                       spaces[num_spaces].w = xarray[x1] - xarray[x];
                       spaces[num_spaces].h = yarray[y1] - yarray[y];
-                      if (spaces[num_spaces].w < floating[leftover[i]].w ||
-                          spaces[num_spaces].h < floating[leftover[i]].h)
-                         fitswin = 0;
                       spaces[num_spaces].p = fitswin;
                       num_spaces++;
                    }


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


I guess the question now is, what else did i just break? :)


B*B,
-Smoke.


-- bye!  :) 

"Anyhow, thank goodness there are still some
people who aren't totally fucked up."
                            - Ursula K. LeGuin, "Sleepwalkers".



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to