Am Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:10:08 +0200 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Andreas Volz wrote: > > Am Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:17:02 +0200 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > > > > > >>not including external deps, I made this dotgraph.. > >> > >>not all the stuff from cvs is included, only the stuff I've > >>packaged.. > >> > >>did I miss anything? > > > > > > I'm not a E17 developer, but is the arrow between edje and e > > correct? Does edje really need e? > > the arrow is correct, yes - it indicates e needs edje
Ah, now I see. You build the graph "from the other direction". All dependency graphs I've seen before use the arrows turned into the other direction. I think this is more logic. Then you need simply to "follow the arrows" to get all dependencies from a package. But perhaps other people prefer your style... regards Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
