On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:51:37 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is where you come in (users etc.). If you want better access to > things like nightly source tarballs builds, fast speedy CVS access, > maybe binary tarballs builds, etc. etc. - our own machine will allow Automated system of nightly tarballs, second level of stable, manual created at proper times tarballs (the current tarball system), auto build the binaries from the stable tarballs. Official install script that default to stable/binary tarball installs, but can be configured for unstable tarball and cvs installs. Even then, the cvs install starts with an unstable tarball and cvs updates from that. Anon cvs and tarball mirrors to use a rock solid, minimal bandwidth sync method. Should devs continue to use sf.net cvs, or do we want to move development to the new server once all the teething problems are sorted out and it's rock solid? sf.net dev cvs is a lot less problematic than anon, coz if it sucks too much devs won't use it, and if devs don't use it, then sourceforge won't have any source to forge.
pgpWi2L8g3rYF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
