On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 03:26:27 +0300 Ulisses Furquim <[email protected]>
said:

> Raster,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:11:46 +0300 Ulisses Furquim <[email protected]>
> > said:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:39:56 +0400 batden <[email protected]> said:
> >> >
> >> > that contains translations for specific applications and toolsets etc.
> >> > not 1 mo per app at all (no way to know how the .desktop file maps to
> >> > some specific .mo to open). what mo file contains the translations? if
> >> > what you say is true - the .mo translations are used to GENERATe
> >> > the.desktop files - then the .desktop files should have all the
> >> > translations in them. they don't.
> >> >
> >> > so where is the magic .mo or set of .mo's that need to be loaded and
> >> > used? and don't tell me "every .mo in the langpack local dir needs to be
> >> > loaded" as thats just not going to happen :)
> >>
> >> In Ubuntu they're using a "X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain" key in the
> >> .desktop file to specify the translation domain for gettext. :-) Other
> >> distros must be using something similar.
> >
> > but gnome-terminal.mo... doesn't exist for most locales. ffor example for
> > gnome-terminal. same with inkscape, or gimp... the only ones i see are for
> > en_*
> > - n de, fr, es, pt, ja, ko... etc.
> 
> IIRC they have langpack packages so you can have .mo files only for
> some locales (and I think someone on this thread already mentioned
> that).

yeah - i know.. BUT i have installed langpacks for all my locales that i
speak/deal with or understand. packages there. no mo files as described. not in
langpacks or regular locale for that matter.

> > that mo can be sanely used for the app - but a launcher/menu having to load
> > an extra N .mo files (1 per app/desktop) just to get 1, 2 or 3 strings from
> > them for the .desktop... that seems a wonderfully extreme way to do this.
> > and evidence doesn't show that this is the case - at least here on 10.04
> 
> Well, I do think they do that. However, in order to be sure I'd need to check.

thats just SILLY. what - so have to get gettext to map in another 500 mo files
just to get translations? someone over in ubuntu/xdg/whatever land is smoking
some serious crack if they proposed this as a brilliant idea. they obviously
care nothing for efficiency or performance. now we need to do yet more caching
and merging and mapping into mmaped files as well as montior modified
timestamps of yet more indirectly accessed files beyond what we already do.
incredibly brilliant. - grumpy raster up and bitching today. beware.

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to