On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:24:47 -0700 Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> said:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:58:09PM +0200, jls legalize wrote: > > https://launchpad.net/~enlightenment-git/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=trusty > > I'm on debian, I know ubuntu packages won't work out of the box, but > maybe I can rebuild the source package. > Currently I have the e19 package from sparky linux which is built a bit > weirdly, but at least it's self contained. > > As for anyone who's going to ask me why don't I just build it myself, > I've stopped building (and more importantly make-installing) complex > packages on my system, I just don't want untracked files, it's more > trouble than it's worth for me. it's surprisingly un-complex. and if you don't go using --prefix=/usr ... it's easy to track. eg /usr/local == everything i installed from src. if i wanted efl/e isolated i may do --prefix=/opt/e - i want to delete it all .. rm -rf /opt/e ... it's that simple. none of efl or e will install anything outside of the prefix given so it's clean and neat. anyway - up to you. you just are overestimating the cost. that's all. > It would be cool if Debian shipped a more up to date E, but I guess > there aren't enough E users on debian maybe? at least in developer circles for efl/e the majority of devs are on arch. arc has nice up-to-date packages of efl and e and aur has git master follow packages. it's clean, neat and up to date. opensuse is not bad either thanks to simotek. debian is in probably one of the worst shapes when it comes to efl/e. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
