Hello. On 29/05/15 03:55, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:24:47 -0700 Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> said: > >> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:58:09PM +0200, jls legalize wrote: >>> https://launchpad.net/~enlightenment-git/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=trusty >> I'm on debian, I know ubuntu packages won't work out of the box, but >> maybe I can rebuild the source package. >> Currently I have the e19 package from sparky linux which is built a bit >> weirdly, but at least it's self contained. >> >> As for anyone who's going to ask me why don't I just build it myself, >> I've stopped building (and more importantly make-installing) complex >> packages on my system, I just don't want untracked files, it's more >> trouble than it's worth for me. > it's surprisingly un-complex. and if you don't go using --prefix=/usr ... it's > easy to track. eg /usr/local == everything i installed from src. if i wanted > efl/e isolated i may do --prefix=/opt/e - i want to delete it all .. rm > -rf /opt/e ... it's that simple. none of efl or e will install anything > outside > of the prefix given so it's clean and neat. > > anyway - up to you. you just are overestimating the cost. that's all. > >> It would be cool if Debian shipped a more up to date E, but I guess >> there aren't enough E users on debian maybe? > at least in developer circles for efl/e the majority of devs are on arch. arc > has nice up-to-date packages of efl and e and aur has git master follow > packages. it's clean, neat and up to date. opensuse is not bad either thanks > to > simotek. debian is in probably one of the worst shapes when it comes to efl/e. >
Last time I checked it looked like this: https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/packaging_status/ regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
