I actually pondered disabling it but in the end I didn't. It's not so much
that we need to keep our staff from doing nefarious things but every now
and then there's a situation you might just need to keep things under wraps
-- which is why I didn't disable private browsing. IMHO this is way more
about psychology and trust in the workplace than anything else.


Regards,
Chris

On 16 August 2016 at 13:30, William Spratt <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Private Browsing is relatively meaningless in a network environment.  As I
> understand it, all it does it prevent any local record being taken of
> internet activity.  Fine in a domestic environment (two extremes that
> spring to mind are buying a spouse a surprise present or googling how to
> escape an abusive relationship) but in a network environment you should
> have a server record of traffic going to and from a particular machine,
> complete with user ID.
>
> So the question becomes do you want to enable private browsing and your
> employees thinking they can do whatever they want, or disable private
> browsing so they know that potentially their browsing history can be
> monitored?  In practice I've found that no one has the time to investigate
> a staff member's browsing history unless a colleague has already flagged
> concerns.
>
> Regards
>
> Will
>
> Will Spratt
> IT Science Support Specialist
> Tel:         01904 46 2631
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Enterprise [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Chris Puttick
> Sent: 16 August 2016 11:41
> To: Kaply Consulting
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Why folks need to disable private
> browsing...
>
> Schools: same reason as parents +cyber-bullying evidence +other risks
>
> Enterprises & govt, other than security concerns, same reason as parents,
> +insider trading, stock pumping et al audit trail
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 16 August 2016 at 11:28, Kaply Consulting <[email protected]> wrote:
> > When I'm explaining to people why governments, schools, enterprises, etc.
> > want to disable things in Firefox, most of the things (Sync, Developer
> > Tools) are easy, but I have trouble explaining why someone (other than
> > a parent :) ) would want to disable private browsing.
> >
> > For folks that do disable private browsing within their organization,
> > are there legal, regulatory or other reasons to disable private
> > browsing? Or is it just preference?
> >
> > Thanks for your input.
> >
> > Mike Kaply
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Enterprise mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to
> > [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Puttick
> +44 7908 997 146
> CP1 Associates Limited
> Company no. 7499788
> Regd Office: The Studio Witney Lakes Resort, Downs Road, Witney,
> Oxfordshire, OX29 0SY
>
> @putt1ck
> putt1ck.blogspot.com
> skype: putt1ck
> _______________________________________________
> Enterprise mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/
> listinfo/enterprise or send an email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> _______________________________________________
> Enterprise mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/
> listinfo/enterprise or send an email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise

To unsubscribe from this list, please visit 
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to 
[email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Reply via email to