On 10/24/2000 10:08 PM, "Paul Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 10/24/00 9:55 PM, "Dan Crevier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Getting rid of the delay 1 would probably work...
> 
> �unless it makes it worse. A continuous repeat will eat up thousands of CPU
> cycles. 

Thousands of CPU cycles at hundreds of MHz doesn't add up to much :-)  In
this case, I think the script won't actually get much time to run while the
calendar is opening, and as soon as it opens, the script will stop sucking
time.  All it can do is make the window open more slowly.

Dan


--
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to