On 11/5/00 9:26 AM, I wrote:

> On 11/4/00 8:40 PM, "Dan Crevier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> (Tim wrote:)
>>> How about adding an option "as html" to the get and set text verbs? It
>>> is easy enough to parse html, and this would solve a lot of other
>>> problems to, regarding creating html messages.
>> 
>> And, "as unicode html", of course. :-)  This isn't totally easy though.
>> You go from being able to just take text & more text to having to parse
>> out the </body> tag and quote any text you want to insert ( & -> &amp;,
>> etc), and then stick it back it.  Is this something people would really
>> do? 
> 
> I don't think so, not many anyhow. I don't think this would be such a
> great solution. Especially if it too would be a lot of work, I'd much
> prefer to see full support for the text suite further down the road.
> 

I'll revise that. Akua Sweets scripting addition has a great HTML Suite that
makes all this easy. (parse ML, compile ML, add table, parse table, compile
table, parse tag, compile tag, parse tag val, compile tag val, resolve SRC
tag, with a Class HTML Table Rec and Class URL Path). If you could
incorporate that suite under a license from Akua, I'd go along with this as
a solution.  If MBU can farm out Dictionaries to outside contractors, why
not a scripting addition suite, if it saves everyone a lot of trouble?


-- 
Paul Berkowitz


-- 
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives: 
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to