They don't really reconcile. I'm into ambiguity (check out my site at
http://www.ambigram.com for more ambiguous stuff...)
Entourage is a great product (email merge flaws notwithstanding), but it
comes from Micro$oft, which have Mac users have a long-standing history of
bashing. So En'rage pokes a bit of fun at MS, while still being a usable
nickname. I simply prefer it to E'rage, which sounds like a marketing guy's
take on the whole "tack an E in front of everything and make it hip"
phenomenon.
on 12/4/00 11:55 AM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 12/4/00 9:43 AM, "Word.Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Keep up the great work!
>> PS- I prefer En'rage to E'rage as a nickname, since it
>> 3) Reflects the hardcore Mac User's general animosity towards MS products
>
> Please explain how you reconcile these two comments. If you think that MS's
> Entourage team is doing great work, why do you want to perpetuate and
> increase further Mac users' animosity towards MS products?
--
Word.Net Communications =http://Word.Net =eMailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
http://1-877-Site.Com =360MB Domains from $7.50/month!
-== Reliable, Cost-Effective Web Hosting Since 1995 ==-
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
