On 3/28/01 6:20 AM, "Deborah Shadovitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd already upped the RAM from 12 to 30 before I wrote. I am shocked
> by how much this "feature" needs. I have always been against HTML email, as
> I clearly wrote in Mac Efficiency 101, but now I am even more against it
Obviously there are other factors at work. I only have the Preferred Size
set at 20MB and this seems to work for complex HTML just fine. I'd like to
know what the minimum setting for complex HTML is across the board just to
get a feel of whether my system is right or not.
I have my doubts about HTML mail, but... I do get some mail which is
undoubtedly easier to read quickly because it is clearly formatted. The
content could have been sent as an attachment but I don't have control over
the sender's preferences! More and more email is less of a messaging medium
and increasingly document focused. In the latter case, plain text doesn't
really cut it.
Tony
--
IT Matters - A consultancy for getting value from your investment in IT
Tony Crooks
IT Matters
53 Mendip Avenue
EASTBOURNE
BN23 8ER
Tel: +44 (0)1323-460789
Fax: +44 (0)1323-769832
<mailto: 'Tony Crooks', [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
