On 1/26/02 5:07 PM, "Peter Levy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does that mean you now understand the question? By way of example, there is
> no Unflagged status, there is only a Flagged status. To find items which are
> not Flagged, we would look for [Status Is Not Flagged]. The same is not true
> of Read/Unread. There is a Read status, of which we could enquire [Status Is
> Read] as well as [Status Is Not Read]. Fine so far. But I am asking
> therefore why is there a separate Status for Unread, for which we can
> enquire [Status Is Not Unread] or [Status Is Unread]. It seems redundant. If
> it is not, I would like to know what the difference is.
It might have been clearer to Greg what you were asking if you had shown
brackets of some type as demarcation points. Greg, what Peter is asking is
why there should be both these possibilities available:
<Status> <Is> <Unread>
<Status> <Is Not> <Read>
It's probably totally accidental and due to inefficient proofreading, I
would guess. I can't think of any situation where only one would do rather
than the other. Maybe "Unread" was meant to be "Sent" or "Unsent" instead.
That's missing from Status popup. Too bad we didn't catch this in the beta
program.
--
Paul Berkowitz
--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
