Thanks for clarifying my clarification, Paul. And for the answer. -- Cheers, Peter
On 26/1/2002 9:06 PM, Paul Berkowitz wrote: >> Does that mean you now understand the question? By way of example, there is >> no Unflagged status, there is only a Flagged status. To find items which are >> not Flagged, we would look for [Status Is Not Flagged]. The same is not true >> of Read/Unread. There is a Read status, of which we could enquire [Status Is >> Read] as well as [Status Is Not Read]. Fine so far. But I am asking >> therefore why is there a separate Status for Unread, for which we can >> enquire [Status Is Not Unread] or [Status Is Unread]. It seems redundant. If >> it is not, I would like to know what the difference is. > > It might have been clearer to Greg what you were asking if you had shown > brackets of some type as demarcation points. Greg, what Peter is asking is > why there should be both these possibilities available: > > <Status> <Is> <Unread> > <Status> <Is Not> <Read> > > It's probably totally accidental and due to inefficient proofreading, I > would guess. I can't think of any situation where only one would do rather > than the other. Maybe "Unread" was meant to be "Sent" or "Unsent" instead. > That's missing from Status popup. Too bad we didn't catch this in the beta > program. -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
